Comments on: Mana Disruption Improvements http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/ Just another WordPress weblog Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:50:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: Viril http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/#comment-3998 Viril Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:40:38 +0000 http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/#comment-3998 As you'd see in the description. I said "Now, I am not sure how creatures work, but if creatures are branded with spheres in that a GM could say " Notice the word "IF" -- obviously, if physical critters are not branded with a sphere, then such a condition as I posted would be required would not exist. The crux of the proposal is the rest of the post, not this one sentence. As you’d see in the description. I said “Now, I am not sure how creatures work, but if creatures are branded with spheres in that a GM could say ”

Notice the word “IF” — obviously, if physical critters are not branded with a sphere, then such a condition as I posted would be required would not exist.

The crux of the proposal is the rest of the post, not this one sentence.

]]> By: Kaldonis http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/#comment-3991 Kaldonis Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:13:33 +0000 http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/#comment-3991 I think the idea overall is good. However, regardless of the implementation possibility, the sphere of mana a creature uses should not be related to this spell at all. Mana disruption works on non-magical creatures as well as magical creatures. If you want benefits based on the appropriate mana control, then you really have to be willing to make the spell more like 719 so it won't work on squares well at all, and I don't think this is a good trade-off. I think the idea overall is good.

However, regardless of the implementation possibility, the sphere of mana a creature uses should not be related to this spell at all. Mana disruption works on non-magical creatures as well as magical creatures. If you want benefits based on the appropriate mana control, then you really have to be willing to make the spell more like 719 so it won’t work on squares well at all, and I don’t think this is a good trade-off.

]]> By: raven http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/#comment-1562 raven Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:20:25 +0000 http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/#comment-1562 702 does enough damage as it is. 702 does enough damage as it is.

]]> By: lashou http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/#comment-168 lashou Mon, 02 Jun 2008 22:27:39 +0000 http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/#comment-168 i like this idea and like the thought and detail you are going into on all of the reviews you are suggessting here and on the gs boards i like this idea and like the thought and detail you are going into on all of the reviews you are suggessting here and on the gs boards

]]> By: Virilneus’ GS4 Idea Book » Blog Archive » My Sorcerer Spell List Review http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/#comment-7 Virilneus’ GS4 Idea Book » Blog Archive » My Sorcerer Spell List Review Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:00:10 +0000 http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/#comment-7 [...] 702 - Add Damage Modifiers. [...] […] 702 - Add Damage Modifiers. […]

]]> By: Virilneus’ GS4 Idea Book » Blog Archive » 713 or 716: Major Disruption or Essence Ball http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/#comment-5 Virilneus’ GS4 Idea Book » Blog Archive » 713 or 716: Major Disruption or Essence Ball Sat, 08 Dec 2007 16:17:06 +0000 http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/#comment-5 [...] spell would be a souped up version of 702 with multiple damage rolls on each cast. Also, like with my 702 proposal this spell would be modified by mana controls to increase damage [...] […] spell would be a souped up version of 702 with multiple damage rolls on each cast. Also, like with my 702 proposal this spell would be modified by mana controls to increase damage […]

]]> By: Virilneus’ GS4 Idea Book » Blog Archive » Disintegrate Improvements http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/#comment-2 Virilneus’ GS4 Idea Book » Blog Archive » Disintegrate Improvements Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:45:01 +0000 http://www.virilneus.com/blog/2007/12/08/mana-disruption-improvements/#comment-2 [...] Virilneus’ GS4 Idea Book Just another WordPress weblog « Mana Disruption Improvements [...] […] Virilneus’ GS4 Idea Book Just another WordPress weblog « Mana Disruption Improvements […]

]]>